Title Page

Article Title: Should be concise and clearly reflect the core content and scope of application of the guidelines and consensus.

Authors' Names and Their Affiliations.

Corresponding Author Contact Information. ## Keywords (3-5 keywords for indexing and searching purposes).

Abstract

Background: A brief introduction to the background and purpose of developing the guidelines and consensus.

Methods: Description of the process for developing the guidelines and consensus, methods for evaluating evidence, and techniques for forming consensus.

Results: An overview of the main recommendations and conclusions of the guidelines and consensus.

Conclusion: Emphasize the clinical significance and application value of the guidelines and consensus.

Word Limit: Typically around 250 words.

Keywords

3-5 Keywords.

Main Text

1. Introduction

Background Information: An overview of the background in the relevant medical field, highlighting the importance of developing guidelines and consensus.

Necessity for Developing Guidelines and Consensus: Clearly state the reasons for developing guidelines and consensus and the expected issues to be resolved.

2. Methods

2.1 Process of Developing Guidelines and Consensus:

Describe the process of developing guidelines and consensus, including organizational structure and participating experts.

Evidence Assessment: Explain the methods and criteria used for evaluating evidence.

Consensus Formation Techniques: Describe how consensus is reached through discussion and voting.

2.2 Classification of Recommendations and Levels of Evidence:

Describe the classification system for recommendations and the grading of evidence.

Evidence Sources: Explain the sources of evidence and literature search strategies.

2.3 Content of Guidelines and Consensus:

List in detail the main and secondary recommendations in the guidelines and consensus.

Basis for Recommendations: Provide evidence support and consensus level for each recommendation.

3. Recommendations and Conclusions

3.1 Main Recommendations: Present the main recommendations in the guidelines and consensus and their corresponding levels of evidence.

3.2 Secondary Recommendations: Describe the secondary recommendations and their levels of evidence.

3.3 Implementation Suggestions: Provide specific suggestions and strategies for implementing the guidelines and consensus.

4. Discussion

4.1 Significance of Recommendations: Discuss the potential impact of the guidelines and consensus recommendations on clinical practice.

4.2 Limitations of Guidelines and Consensus: Discuss the limitations and possible biases in the development process.

4.3 Implementation Challenges: Discuss the challenges and solutions that may be faced in implementing the guidelines and consensus.

5. Acknowledgments

Thanks to funders, assistants, participating experts, etc.

6. Conflict of Interest Statement

Clearly state any potential conflicts of interest for all participants.

7. References

A formatted reference list according to journal requirements.

8. Appendix (if applicable)

Additional or supplementary data of the guidelines and consensus (e.g., evidence assessment forms, consensus meeting records, etc.).